Choice for my rack

lawfai

Finally I decide to buy rack for my av and hifi. Will you choose to buy two hifi rack instead of one av rack.

1. Taoc MSR-3L-DB (All in one)

2. Solidsteel 5.2( centre speaker + TV) , Solidsteel h6 partner (av amp, stereo amp, blu-ray, cdp)

Price should be similar but which overall sound better?

tonyx

我會建設買項目一.

如果買項目二, 不如買大陸架吧!

效果差唔多, 又可以有差價買多幾件碟.

benson26

Solidsteel真係咁差？？同大陸架一様？？

redoctober

我覺得solidsteel 好野，用緊h5, 幫我收左好多肥婆低音，價又唔太貴，
taoc 隨時要皮皮聲，好貴.

bmb_hd

tonyx 發表於 2012-4-25 10:30
我會建設買項目一.

如果買項目二, 不如買大陸架吧!

Why choice 2 so bad?

tonyx

bmb_hd 發表於 2012-4-25 20:57
Why choice 2 so bad?

個人覺得板薄架化震能力低，如果以此價錢有更好選擇。
如要差不多質量的產品，國內大把但平很多。
以上純粹個人觀感，可能引起其他師兄不滿或反感，在此深表抱歉。

lawfai

Thank you ching. However, some ching said that Taoc MSR series is not good and should at least buy ASR series. Is it MSR series so bad?

bmb_hd

tonyx 發表於 2012-4-25 23:19
個人覺得板薄架化震能力低，如果以此價錢有更好選擇。
如要差不多質量的產品，國內大把但平很多。
以上純 ...

我反而覺得有時Taoc反震效果太好令到唔好声。

利益申報：

我沒有在用Taoc 或 Solid steel 既机架。

但曾經 用過 TAOC SSR series & Solid Steel 6.3

tonyx

bmb_hd 發表於 2012-4-26 00:31
我反而覺得有時Taoc反震效果太好令到唔好声。

利益申報：

ss 6.x series is different story and different price.

Did you compare them before?

bmb_hd

tonyx 發表於 2012-4-26 09:11
ss 6.x series is different story and different price.

Did you compare them before?

Do u mean Solid Steel 6.x series?

Yup, though I did not try Taoc vs Solid steel head to head but I did try below on my own Hifi system before

Taoc vs Copulare
Solid Steel 6.3 vs FE Spider vs Copulare

http://www.finite-elemente.de/etc_en/index_en
http://www.copulare.de/english/home.html

Due to personal preference, I keep the FE spider and Copulare.

bmb_hd

tonyx 發表於 2012-4-25 23:19
個人覺得板薄架化震能力低，如果以此價錢有更好選擇。
如要差不多質量的產品，國內大把但平很多。
以上純 ...

我想好多網友都想問你会介绍那些大陸架，

因為後者比较良秀不齊，

其实，机架都係要同D机mix & match 及要trial & error,

以我自己木耳经验，全木架會好林声，唔係o甘recommend。

tonyx

bmb_hd 發表於 2012-4-26 09:38
Do u mean Solid Steel 6.x series?

Yup, though I did not try Taoc vs Solid steel head to head but  ...

Solid Steel 6.2 or .3 or .4 ...series is better than Taoc MSR series.

Yes, you are right. But not 5.2 or 5.3 or 5.4.......

But I don't agree about 有時Taoc反震效果太好令到唔好声.

tonyx

bmb_hd 發表於 2012-4-26 09:45
我想好多網友都想問你会介绍那些大陸架，

因為後者比较良秀不齊，

You can refer the following link from member kentsang about the rack

http://www.hiendy.com/hififorum/ ... highlight=%E6%9E%B6



or the rack recommended by Fayefei



Thanks!

lawfai

How about Taoc MSR compare to SS H6 or H6 Partner?

avmilk

i used to own the above brands, base on vibration control, standalone rack is better than rectangle one

the overall build quality of TAOC is better than solidsteel, but in sonic, solidsteel sounds more nature (especially for 6 series)

IMHO, the performance of higher model is slightly difference for av purpose

bmb_hd

tonyx 發表於 2012-4-26 10:18
You can refer the following link from member kentsang about the rack

http://www.hiendy.com/hififo ...

Thanks for your sharing. Let me have a look when I am free.

bmb_hd

lawfai 發表於 2012-4-26 11:23
How about Taoc MSR compare to SS H6 or H6 Partner?

I have no experience of A/B comparison of the two mentioned rack, but what I can see from friends or web mates is:

MSR series is normally used for AV stuff while Higher models of TAOC for HiFi stuff.
So in sonic performance the latter should be better.

In my perception, you should compare Solid Steel H6 or H6 partner to TAOC higher model but not MSR series.

lawfai

Price of SS6 h or partner is lower than SS6.x  and is similar to taoc MSR series. In fact, the thickness of the mdf board of h6 or partner is similar to SS5. Any Ching can comment the sound of h6 or partner to SS6.x. If performance is similar,  I should choose SS 6h or partner?

tonyx

You can see a lot of solid steel Ching change their board to plastic or marble but you seldom hear the Taoc user will change.

Fayefei

如Tonyx c hing話齋, 噯推介的架是平令正的.
連本身用緊Taoc架的用家亦轉用這架