AE8000

SSSS

出咗啦，同場AE7000清貨，啲價Ok wow.



- 發送自我的 iPhone 大板凳應用

bigpun1975

how much of 7000 now?

SSSS

AE7000連兩隻眼鏡唔駛兩皮


- 發送自我的 iPhone 大板凳應用

MingSir

How about AE8000 Then ?

Which generation of 3D glasses did AE8000 use ?

MingSir

Oh, got it, it's the same as AE7000-------TYEW3D3

ccscho

Can you PM me the price of AE8000 also please?  Thank you.

chukk

ching, where is the shop that shows both projectors?

SSSS

chukk 發表於 2012-10-9 20:51
ching, where is the shop that shows both projectors?

Please check pm


- 發送自我的 iPhone 大板凳應用

wng328

潻置 2/F 應可試齊兩部, 和 Sony HW30.
但我很想比較 Panasonic AE8000 & Sony 新机HW50 之光度和顏色等. 有無 Ching 作過比較?

MingSir

SONY HW50ES 好似未出喎 !

breadvan

wng328 發表於 2012-10-15 10:19
潻置 2/F 應可試齊兩部, 和 Sony HW30.
但我很想比較 Panasonic AE8000 & Sony 新机HW50 之光度和顏色等.  ...

Sorry to jump in, but comparison sometimes could be very hard unless both displays are at the same place using same chain of gear, and you know that BOTH  displays are calibrated to the same exact standard using their best modes, eg, not preset that has say unsaturated color to start with, etc.

wng328

SONY HW50ES 應10月底有售, 有些國家己開始賣.

我較関心流明度之比較, 因為現在用投影机每天數小時, 連晚飯時也用它來看新聞, 使用時會有 Ambient light, 我看这是用投影机之大趨勢, 所以廠商所出之投影机之流明度也逾來逾高.
SONY HW30ES  是 1300 流明,  SONY HW50ES 是 1700 流明
AE7000 是2000 流明, AE 8000 是2400 流明

但看數字不能作準, 因為 SONY HW30ES 應比 AE7000 同樣或稍光. 如有 Ching 作過这比較, 請給意見.
所以按推断, SONY HW50ES 應比AE8000 之光度高.

breadvan

Again there is no industrial standard on measuring lumens and contrast so the figures are usually pumped out to draw attention although one would expect the new ones are better than the last model. For lumens the advertised figure usually based on their brightest mode with wide open iris, usually resulted in wash out color and much lower contrast,  so it is unlikely one will be using such mode, once calibrated at the proper mode the actual lumens would be much lower.


- 發送自我的 iPhone 大板凳應用

MingSir

如用 2D film 比較, HW30ES (claimed to be 1,3000 Lumens only) 和 AE7000(2,000 lumens)光度好接近, 但一轉到 3D, 就好明顯 SONY 暗過 AE7000好多, 相信是 3D 眼鏡設計問題, 當時仍用緊Panasonic 第二代眼鏡試, AE8000 Lumens 增大左, 又用第三代眼鏡, 3D 用 Cinema 1 或 Cinema 2 mode 睇已好理想 ! 3D 眼鏡的影響都幾大, 要留意 !

Ken310

MingSir 發表於 2012-10-16 13:38
如用 2D film 比較, HW30ES (claimed to be 1,3000 Lumens only) 和 AE7000(2,000 lumens)光度好接近, 但一 ...

其實需唔需要咁計較邊部光啲，睇投影乜唔係熄燈睇ga咩?
同埋啲數字我覺得好唔真實

ccscho

If they specify ANSI Lumen and not just Lumen, they should conform to certain standard.  Minor difference may still exists though as the brightness may differ from center to corners.

A higher brightness projector can give you brighter feel, of course it has to be accompanied by high contrast ratio to give you full spectrum from white to black.  Sony SXRD has to achieve the high contrast via auto-iris but JVC DILA can provide you native contrast ratio.  A low brightness/lumen projector will make you feel it's grey but not white.

During the lifespan of the projector lamp unit, its brightness actually varies.  So all figures in specification are just for reference only.

breadvan

ccscho 發表於 2012-10-16 22:14
If they specify ANSI Lumen and not just Lumen, they should conform to certain standard.  Minor diffe ...

Good point about ANSI lumen, but the sad fact is manufacturers, most of them anyway, do not specify what standard they are using, making comparison of lumen purely base on manufacturer supplied figures a moot exercise.

breadvan

Ken310 發表於 2012-10-16 19:22
其實需唔需要咁計較邊部光啲，睇投影乜唔係熄燈睇ga咩?
同埋啲數字我覺得好唔真實  ...

There is real functional advantage for projectors with higher lumens, e.g., you could project to a much bigger screen and from a longer distance, also for 3D which requires higher lumen to look its best because of the 3D glasses, etc.