請問邊位Ching聽過 Vivid Audio V 1.5 喇叭

uglymask

請問邊位Ching聽過 Vivid Audio V 1.5喇叭，可以分享一下。

順便介紹下用乜AMP推？

Thx

tst123

Vivid 1.5 has good dynamics. Sound bigger than the size suggests. Try it out at Excel. They are using Mimetism amp to drive them.

uglymask

tst123 發表於 2013-7-23 08:25
Vivid 1.5 has good dynamics. Sound bigger than the size suggests. Try it out at Excel. They are usin ...

How about compare with Focal Micro Utopia? which one is better?

tst123

total different speakers. In fact, I am using a pair of Focal microutopia myself in Shenzhen. Vivid bass is much better but Focal high is much better. Vivid is faster but Focal is more relaxing. For resale value, Focal is better.

uglymask

tst123 發表於 2013-7-23 08:57
total different speakers. In fact, I am using a pair of Focal microutopia myself in Shenzhen. Vivid  ...

Thank you for respondence,

How about the image, detail and resolution of both speakers, I mostly concern about the detail which one can be offer more.

tst123

uglymask 發表於 2013-7-23 09:13
Thank you for respondence,

How about the image, detail and resolution of both speakers, I mostly  ...

I only have listened to Vivid 1.5 for a short period, about 30 min. It's performance is competitive in that price region. Your concern is understandable but due to the short audition, I am afraid it is unfair o Vivid to give an opinion of all that. As to Microutopia, it's image , detail and resolution are all very good. Compared to Vivid, Focal lacks deep bass, its bass is relatively loose and thin. If you listen to pop and rock more often, I recommend Vivid. If you listen to vocal more often, then it must be Focal. Focal is more relaxing whereas Vivid gives you a better soundstage. You

tst123

uglymask 發表於 2013-7-23 09:13
Thank you for respondence,

How about the image, detail and resolution of both speakers, I mostly  ...

Room acoustics is also a major factor. Excel doe have a much better room than my home despite the listening area is about the same.