Low Cost Audiophile Music Servers

obee

上網找到呢個, 我覺得幾有趣, 在此分享俾有玩呢類東西的師兄們:
http://hifiduino.wordpress.com/2014/03/01/

t1174

真不明白為何要買台660cc 的車而唔正經買台2000cc 的，雖然我也感5000cc 的車太浪費的說。

ackcheng

可能系engine太大，太noisy!

Crymen

可能部 660cc 好玩過部 2000cc 呢

ma73

Crymen 發表於 2014-8-15 08:45
可能部 660cc 好玩過部 2000cc 呢

ha ha , may be

patkwok

Obee兄,

小弟近期見淘寶有fanless既i5 i7電腦仔行SSD既
唔知你有無用過黎行CAS呢?
有無咩評價呢?

謝謝

ma73

t1174 發表於 2014-8-14 15:47
真不明白為何要買台660cc 的車而唔正經買台2000cc 的，雖然我也感5000cc 的車太浪費的說。 ...

The topic said (Low Cost Audiophile Music Servers), may be the reason

obee

patkwok 發表於 2014-8-15 09:07
Obee兄,

小弟近期見淘寶有fanless既i5 i7電腦仔行SSD既

無.
因為我三月時已經買有了一台:
http://www.hiendy.com/hififorum/ ... id=71222&extra=

obee

ma73 發表於 2014-8-15 09:10
The topic said (Low Cost Audiophile Music Servers), may be the reason

Actually this topic is talking about the current technical limitation for implementing audiophile music server using ARM CPU devices. The author found that two ARM CPU devices in market which are most suitable for music server, the Raspberry Pi and BeagleBone Black. The reason why only the above two were chosen to study is because they provide I2S output. However, it is concluded that (refer to the table in post #1) there are some limitation at the moment that makes them can't be a "perfect" audiophile music server. The limitation as summarize (as a recap):

1. BeagleBone Black no native support of master clock signal for 44.1, in hongkongese's term: 無原生鐘俾44.1
2. Rasberry Pi only can support up to 192k clock signal.
3. Rasberry Pi can't feed in external master clock

ma73

obee 發表於 2014-8-15 09:23
Actually this topic is talking about the current technical limitation for implementing audiophile  ...

oh, I see Obee hing