手放在耳的後面來聽歌

hifi-man

javascript:;

請各位師兄指教, 是否我的錯覺?

我試用我的手放在我耳的後面來聽歌 (如照片), 我發覺整套音響系統改善到另一個層次, 如微細的聲音好像清晰了, 分析力好像高了, 整體音樂好像豐富了, 我希望這不是我的錯覺 ?? 請指教. 謝謝.

junk

我去concert好多時都cup耳朵聽，要聽定位cup耳後清楚好多。n年前TAS有編嘢都講過呢個現像，當時仲有人出過啲紙做大耳朵cut out嚟賣。

Zack

兜風耳...

Fayefei

因改變了聲反射角度...自然5同, 好定5好無定論.....

新漢陳Sir

這是千真萬確的事。我很久以前在家裏聼罐頭音樂或聼實況演出時已察覺此現象，只是前者較明顯，因為可有助聽到更多直射音。

momei

I just listened to Camina Burana. And tried many times with both hands behind the ears and without. With hands there, the soundstage is markedly wider, clearly wall to wall. Hands off, the width shrank, though depth remained constant.
Good discovery!!
Will have hands behind ears from now on when listening to large works.

krell

有的時候小小微調喇叭擺位會減輕此問題

momei

momei 發表於 2015-8-28 17:35
I just listened to Camina Burana. And tried many times with both hands behind the ears and without.  ...

Just amazing.
When I listened to Belafonte in Carnegie Hall, Matilda track, the hall sound I had been looking for was there!!

澳門客

號角原理而已，第一次世界大戰後，雷達未發明前，是用一組號角反轉收集天空裡敵方戰機飛來的聲音

GREENSPAN

戴眼鏡與不戴眼鏡聽嘢都有分別, 特別係高音!

momei

momei 發表於 2015-8-28 18:00
Just amazing.
When I listened to Belafonte in Carnegie Hall, Matilda track, the hall sound I had b ...

我的椅是高背，靠牆放，後面用個小咕

flight

刚刚試過聽落立体D冇咁平面
兜风耳先可以算係金耳朵

Fayefei

GREENSPAN 發表於 2015-8-28 18:36
戴眼鏡與不戴眼鏡聽嘢都有分別, 特別係高音!

懞眼同5懞眼聽嘢都有分別的
試過集體玩呢個測驗

GREENSPAN

Fayefei 發表於 2015-8-28 16:56
懞眼同5懞眼聽嘢都有分別的
試過集體玩呢個測驗

有科學實驗眼晴四週皮膚對接收高音較敏感!

Fayefei

GREENSPAN 發表於 2015-8-28 22:09
有科學實驗眼晴四週皮膚對接收高音較敏感!

試過果次集體玩blindfold test, 真係5玩過都5知拱過癮的

GREENSPAN

Fayefei 發表於 2015-8-28 17:14
試過果次集體玩blindfold test, 真係5玩過都5知拱過癮的

其實發現皮膚接收到聲音,特別係高音, 可解釋到理論上人耳只可聽到2萬, 但實際整體高於2萬, 因為再高的由皮膚來"聽"

karsonkwan

好細個已經發覺

ma73

GREENSPAN 發表於 2015-8-28 18:36
戴眼鏡與不戴眼鏡聽嘢都有分別, 特別係高音!

GREENSPAN Ching, ha ha , funny

新漢陳Sir

momei 發表於 2015-8-28 17:35
I just listened to Camina Burana. And tried many times with both hands behind the ears and without.  ...

Persistence will result in sore arms.

momei

I placed a small cushion for the head to rest. Result is similar to using both hands. But my post above got the latter part removed.