Siltech 550L 配 WBT-0681cu 報告

micmic123 · 發表於 2012-5-2 08:03:03

我都想試下張條kondo spc 喇叭線，轉wbt 681 cu

史的墳 · 發表於 2012-5-2 10:04:59

本帖最後由史的墳於 2012-5-2 10:06 編輯

racewong 發表於 2012-5-2 00:43
RUBY HILL換FI50都未有咁勁既改善喎.

3 - 4 friends in this thread also certified this..........

So... you need to do is.... trust!!!

史的墳 · 發表於 2012-5-2 10:11:31

nagramen 發表於 2012-5-2 00:44
曾聽到有人話Siltech高級"原廠"Classic speaker cables,接Amp那边是用WBT 0681ag ,而接Speaker那边是用WBT ...

For G7 Siltech, they all use "self manufactured" plugs.... No WBT.

WBT is just for G5

racewong · 發表於 2012-5-2 11:02:23

史的墳發表於 2012-5-2 10:04
3 - 4 friends in this thread also certified this..........

So... you need to do is.... ...

我無siltech SC喎.

史的墳 · 發表於 2012-5-2 11:08:32

racewong 發表於 2012-5-2 11:02
我無siltech SC喎.

Get one la.....

racewong · 發表於 2012-5-2 11:10:07

史的墳發表於 2012-5-2 11:08
Get one la.....

我條THE ONE SC用得好開心唷! 暫時無諗過換佢喎.

史的墳 · 發表於 2012-5-2 11:14:56

racewong 發表於 2012-5-2 11:10
我條THE ONE SC用得好開心唷! 暫時無諗過換佢喎.

Not like you....

racewong · 發表於 2012-5-2 11:37:48

史的墳發表於 2012-5-2 11:14
Not like you....

最近同朋友傾開偈, 大家都覺得the one比較適合座地既中/大型喇叭.

史的墳 · 發表於 2012-5-2 12:01:43

racewong 發表於 2012-5-2 11:37
最近同朋友傾開偈, 大家都覺得the one比較適合座地既中/大型喇叭.

Why have this conclusion?

racewong · 發表於 2012-5-2 12:32:44

史的墳發表於 2012-5-2 12:01
Why have this conclusion?

因為我地當中, 都有書架 & 中大型座地喇叭既用家, 而我地都用過the one, 所得出既結論.

七仔 · 發表於 2012-5-2 13:29:55

近排身有D痕, 特別係各位響樹蕭踢乜蕭踢物咁 ... ... 用開Audioquest CV6廠線, audiolab舊裝biamp推spendor 1/2 ... ... 近排痕痕地想整返兩對6n喇叭線玩玩 ... ... acrolink好似好貴, 蕭踢更加唔駛諗, saec又唔清楚夠唔夠班, 換埋頭仲要一換16隻 ... ... 唉! 真係九筋都赤埋, 換線仲貴過d機

racewong · 發表於 2012-5-2 13:46:24

七仔發表於 2012-5-2 13:29
近排身有D痕, 特別係各位響樹蕭踢乜蕭踢物咁 ... ... 用開Audioquest CV6廠線, audiolab舊裝biamp推spendor ...

spendor 1/2唔駛用咁貴既SC, 因為佢未必能夠反映換線後既分別.

有朋友用GOTHAM SC推SPENDOR, 已經好好聲, 好舒服.

kachow · 發表於 2012-5-2 13:47:56

racewong 發表於 2012-5-2 11:37
最近同朋友傾開偈, 大家都覺得the one比較適合座地既中/大型喇叭.

同我當年既實驗結果一樣..

The one 係座地喇叭既飄逸感覺好正

但係落係書架低頻就有少少欠缺線條.. 但係0.8用係座地就聚好多.. 不過呢個post都係Siltech..遲d開個taralabs慢慢吹..

racewong · 發表於 2012-5-2 13:49:59

kachow 發表於 2012-5-2 13:47
同我當年既實驗結果一樣.. The one 係座地喇叭既飄逸感覺好正但係落係書架低頻就有 ...

我見樓主史的墳問開, 咪答O下咀囉. HEHE

史的墳 · 發表於 2012-5-2 14:02:12

racewong 發表於 2012-5-2 13:49
我見樓主史的墳問開, 咪答O下咀囉. HEHE

I am always welcome to post other brands in this thread.

史的墳 · 發表於 2012-5-2 14:05:24

本帖最後由史的墳於 2012-5-2 14:05 編輯

kachow 發表於 2012-5-2 13:47
同我當年既實驗結果一樣.. The one 係座地喇叭既飄逸感覺好正但係落係書架低頻就有 ...

Yes. For the ONE, the bass is quite "fat" and sometimes too "boom" for bookshelf speakers.

racewong · 發表於 2012-5-2 14:09:33

史的墳發表於 2012-5-2 14:05
Yes. For the ONE, the bass is quite "fat" and sometimes too "boom" for bookshelf speakers. {:5_17 ...

連KACHOW都係咁講.

我諗你錯怪左對THE ONE SC了.

史的墳 · 發表於 2012-5-2 14:13:12

本帖最後由史的墳於 2012-5-2 14:13 編輯

racewong 發表於 2012-5-2 14:09
連KACHOW都係咁講.

我諗你錯怪左對THE ONE SC了.

I haven't 錯怪 the ONE ar... I just said the ONE is not match with my darTZeel and Focal combo.

In fact, IRONMAN should match with GOLD and SILVER....

The ONE is still a good SC in this price range and have a perfect C/P value. That's the reason I changed from SQ-88 MK II to the ONE after audition from you la......

kachow · 發表於 2012-5-2 14:15:46

本帖最後由 kachow 於 2012-5-2 14:16 編輯

racewong 發表於 2012-5-2 14:09
連KACHOW都係咁講.

我諗你錯怪左對THE ONE SC了.

其實個陣問超牛版主借條The One黎做左個比拼.. 我個陣都係怪0.8唔好. 推到我對Focal又聚又沉.. Taralabs The系列唔全面. 但係深入了解後先發現係我自己試得唔夠全面.

The One有著佢既優勢. Taralabs品牌真係一間出SC既專家. 係睇你識唔識得配黎用..

Tara labs 喇叭線大比拼 The One vs The 0.8
http://www.hiendy.com/hififorum/ ... thread&tid=1564

kachow · 發表於 2012-5-2 14:18:23

史的墳發表於 2012-5-2 14:05
Yes. For the ONE, the bass is quite "fat" and sometimes too "boom" for bookshelf speakers. {:5_17 ...

如果係fat或者boom..會唔會擺喇叭可以解決到?

		自動登錄	找回密碼
密碼			新用戶註冊

[分享] Siltech 550L 配 WBT-0681cu 報告