為黑膠投資多一點

ozrayyau

咦? 咁喺咪要再借返嚟玩玩?

SME V 真係好平凡, 唔值咁多

mr1010

我都有試無推返唱頭就起唱臂，撞咗幾次就已後記得！我轉讓支TT-3給朋友時亦再三提醒，但是我朋友都一樣無 ...
Billy 發表於 2011-6-16 19:44

    小弟仲未試過撞頭滋味 ，每想起個銀碼，就會打醒12分精神。

Simcity

SME V 真係好平凡, 唔值咁多
ozrayyau 發表於 2011-6-16 20:31

I am afraid this is just an illusion, Ozrayyau C Hing :)

mr1010

LP係麻煩，但又值得去麻煩。

howin

LP係麻煩，但又值得去麻煩。
mr1010 發表於 2011-6-16 22:26

    玩到咁大...好正喎

Simcity

LP係麻煩，但又值得去麻煩。
mr1010 發表於 2011-6-16 22:26

Wow, very nice MR1010 C Hing!!!

safin

幾時可以欣賞下個Omega?

JanHau

LP係麻煩，但又值得去麻煩。
mr1010 發表於 2011-6-16 22:26

正呀~

JanHau

玩到咁大...好正喎
howin 發表於 2011-6-16 22:41

你識d咩~

mr1010

冇 Billy 兄的指導，會麻煩好多。

mr1010

幾時可以欣賞下個Omega?
safin 發表於 2011-6-16 23:13

    下次 ^^

studiogrey

琴晚再睇過.唱頭不歸位的話,當升起臂,頭係唔會直接撞到TT3的邊,只是carbon臂管撞到.

studiogrey

TT2的設計有一度比TT3正確的.TT2的臂身較高,臂線在管身上左右游走時,不像3仔咁有時會kick住,阻到carbon臂在音軌上的流性.

ozrayyau

I am afraid this is just an illusion, Ozrayyau C Hing :)
Simcity 發表於 2011-6-16 21:43

    其實佢唔係唔好聲, 四平八穩又易較同易夾, 不過平好多嘅 IV 有佢九成聲。

之前玩過 IV, 而家有 V, 尋晚又攞咗枝 TQ-1 返嚟

Simcity

其實佢唔係唔好聲, 四平八穩又易較同易夾, 不過平好多嘅 IV 有佢九成聲。

ozrayyau 發表於 2011-6-18 09:51

Well, it all depends on your ears and your setup.  To me, a properly setup SME VI and SME V (using its dynamic balance function) sounds very different indeed.  Recently, a C Hing told me he "discovered' the Goldmund 390 Integrated amp actually comes very close to the Telos 600 monoblock (around 九成聲) and another C Hing told me he "discovered" the Sonus faber TT speaker actually betters many higher models from the same manufacturers.  I'll say WOW!!!  It must be a great discovery!!!

ozrayyau

補充一下, 之前枝 IV 係換咗 VDH 銀臂內線, 比較過原裝 V, 原裝 V 聲較大體同定, IV 較生動, 以同一款唱臂線, 唱頭同 V 唔用 Damping 計。

Billy

補充一下, 之前枝 IV 係換咗 VDH 銀臂內線, 比較過原裝 V, 原裝 V 聲較大體同定, IV 較生動, 以同一款唱臂 ...
ozrayyau 發表於 2011-6-18 13:49

我支SME V買回來的時候，已經由原廠upgrade VDH MCS純銀綫，聽落生動又細緻！有人話SME V唔好聲，好大原因係舊庒條臂管綫慮事。現在新庒SME V除了可以upgrade臂管綫外，唱臂綫亦由VDH 501改用更高級的VDH 501 Silver，所以在信息傳送，高低頻的表現亦有提升！
大家都知道SME V係一支動態平衡唱臂，如果你玩支SME V時覺得大"行"或唔夠細緻，可以試下用一半動態和一半靜態平衡去set唱臂。

Simcity

補充一下, 之前枝 IV 係換咗 VDH 銀臂內線, 比較過原裝 V, 原裝 V 聲較大體同定, IV 較生動, 以同一款唱臂線, 唱頭同 V 唔用 Damping 計。
ozrayyau 發表於 2011-6-18 13:49

Ozrayyau C Hing, I have also compared SME IV, SME V and SME V with upgraded VDH internal tonearm cable and contrary to your finding, SME V is actually more livlier provided you've got the setup right.  But I recon the result can differ in different setups and thus we have different understanding for the same gear :)

ozrayyau

Simcity hing,
That's why I keep the V and sell the IV,  because the V still original, I got the chance to upgrade it to VDH internal tonearm wire.